A- de 2018
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Aida Helena Vergara Vergara
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma auto de rechazo por cuanto demanda carece de certeza
- Incumplimiento del requisito de certeza
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, por cuanto el escrito de corrección no subsanó los defectos advertidos en el auto inadmisorio.
Al no encontrar acreditado el requisito de certeza la Sala Plena de la Corporación considera que la demanda formulada carece de aptitud sustantiva y que procede el rechazo.
Se deniega la solicitud de súplica impetrada y se CONFIRMA el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto de seis (6) de diciembre de dos mil diecisiete (2017), mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda formulada por la ciudadana AIDA HELENA VERGARA VERGARA, contra el articulo 4o del Decreto Ley 1295 de 1994, radicado con el consecutivo D-12405.
- SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.